Expert: Children Should Be Allowed To Get Bored

Expert Children Should Be Allowed To Get BoredChildren should be allowed to get bored so they can develop their innate ability to be creative, an education expert says. Dr Teresa Belton told the BBC cultural expectations that children should be constantly active could hamper the development of their imagination.

‘Creative state’

She quizzed author Meera Syal and artist Grayson Perry about how boredom had aided their creativity as children. Syal said boredom made her write, while Perry said it was a “creative state”.

The senior researcher at the University of East Anglia’s School of Education and Lifelong Learning interviewed a number of authors, artists and scientists in her exploration of the effects of boredom. She heard Syal’s memories of the small mining village, with few distractions, where she grew up.

“Boredom is often associated with solitude and Syal spent hours of her early life staring out of the window across fields and woods, watching the changing weather and seasons. But importantly boredom made her write. She kept a diary from a young age, filling it with observations, short stories, poems, and diatribe. And she attributes these early beginnings to becoming a writer late in life.”


‘Development of creative capacity’

And neuroscientist and expert on brain deterioration Prof Susan Greenfield, who also spoke to the academic, warned that being creative “involves being able to develop internal stimulus.”

“Nature abhors a vacuum and we try to fill it,” she said. “Some young people who do not have the interior resources or the responses to deal with that boredom creatively then sometimes end up smashing up bus shelters or taking cars out for a joyride.”

The academic, who has previously studied the impact of television and videos on children’s writing, said: “When children have nothing to do now, they immediately switch on the TV, the computer, the phone or some kind of screen…” but this “tends to short circuit that process and the development of creative capacity”.

How did you conquer your boredom as a kid? Do you agree that boredom can spur kids into creativity?

Source: Hannah Richardson, BBC News

Image: Child Whisperer

One BCS Computer Still Says Notre Dame Is No. 1

One BCS Computer Still Says Notre Dame Is No. 1You saw the BCS Championship Game, right? So you know that Alabama is the best team in the nation. Nobody in their right mind would pick Notre Dame ahead of Alabama after witnessing the carnage that was 42-14 on Monday night. Oh, but the BCS has a computer that still prefers the Irish. So let the BCS bashing continue.

‘Margin of victory’

The Colley Matrix, one of the six computer systems used by the BCS, has Notre Dame ranked No. 1 and the Crimson Tide No. 2. Notre Dame’s final ranking was 0.973997 to Alabama’s 0.961139. Notre Dame had an edge in strength of schedule. Alabama won more games against top 25 teams in the rankings. Margin of victory is not part of the calculations. No matter how the computer spit out that reading, it’s worth mentioning again: An entity the BCS uses still prefers Notre Dame to Alabama.


‘Flaws in the process’

They’re not going to make Alabama give back the trophy over it or anything, and it’s just one of the many rankings the BCS uses to determine who plays in the final game (not who is awarded the championship) but it just shows once again that there are flaws in the process.

We’re all sure to find something new to rail about when the playoff system is implemented for the 2014-15 season. But at least we can be sure that there won’t be such an egregious issue like a team winning 42-14 in the final game, but a component of the system picking the losing team No. 1 anyway … right?

Do you think the BCS should revise their ranking system? Share your opinion with us regarding this BCS computer gaffe!

Source: Frank Schwab, Yahoo Sports

Image: Gamedayr