Unwed Mothers ‘Duped’ to Give Up Babies for Adoption

From Australia to Spain, Ireland to America, and as recent as 1987, young mothers say they were “coerced”, “manipulated”, and “duped” into handing over their babies for adoption. These women say sometimes their parents forged consent documents, but more often they say these forced adoptions were coordinated by the people their families trusted most…priests, nuns, social workers, nurses or doctors.

Last month, a Dan Rather Reports producer and crew were in Canberra, Australia as Parliament released the findings of an 18-month-long investigation revealing illegal and unethical tactics used to convince young, unmarried mothers to surrender their babies to adoptive homes from the late 1940s to the 1980s.

In some cases, mothers in Australia were drugged and forced to sign papers relinquishing custody. In others, women were told their children had died. Single mothers also did not have access to the financial support given to widows or abandoned wives, and many were told by doctors, nurses, and social workers that they were unfit to raise a child.

Two weeks ago, a prominent Canadian law firm announced that it would file a class-action lawsuit against Quebec’s Catholic Church accusing the Church of kidnapping, fraud and coercion to force unwed mothers to give up their children for adoption.

Since October, Dan Rather Reports has contacted nearly 100 alleged victims, social workers, researchers, lawyers and authors from around the world to shine a bright light on the issue of forced adoptions. We have interviewed numerous women in the U.S. who told us that they were sent to maternity homes, denied contact with their families and friends, forced to endure labor with purposely painful procedures  and return home without their babies.  Single, American mothers were also denied financial support and told that their children would be better off without them.

Source: Yahoo News

Image: Bangkok Post

Kris Humphries Wants an Annulment

Kris Humphries thinks he was duped by Kim Kardashian. Do you think he’s right? He is indeed one angry dude. The 26-year-old NBA pro thinks Kardashian defrauded him into getting married, which is the reason he now wants an annulment, reports TMZ.

The story explains how this annulment is Kris’ way of getting money out of Kim. Although the couple had a prenup, Kris claims there were “community and quasi-community assets.” He also wants Kim to pay for his legal fees.

Beverly Hills attorney Mark McBride tells HollywoodLife.com, “As for any financial gain Kris can gain from this, it’s easy. If he can show that the marriage was a con on her part then that can throw doubt in the legitimacy of the pre-nuptial agreement. He then could sue her for damages… If he keeps this in the public eye, it doesn’t make her look good,” he explains. “…He could be jamming her up for a little more cash.”

Kim filed for divorce on 72 days after tying the knot in a $15 million wedding that was broadcast on E!. Despite her and her family’s claims the relationship was real, there are tons of skeptics who believe the entire ordeal was staged for money — and it sounds like Kris is buying it now too.


Source & Image