Iran News Agency Duped By Satirical Onion Story

Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency published a story Friday claiming that a Gallup poll found that rural white Americans prefer Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over President Barack Obama. Such a poll would indeed be big news in Iran (and the United States) — if it were true. But the source was The Onion, the publication that presents the outlandish as real news.

Its serious tone fools many who are new to the lampoons. Onion yarns have tricked news outlets in the U.S. and overseas. What sets Fars apart from others, however, is that the agency published the Onion story as if it were its own. Fars News Agency used the story verbatim, giving the same headline: “Gallup Poll: Rural Whites Prefer Ahmadinejad To Obama”. Fars also took all the at the get-go:


“TEHRAN (FNA) — According to the results of a Gallup poll released Monday, the overwhelming majority of rural white Americans said they would rather vote for Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad than US President Barack Obama.” (The Onion story used a Charleston, West Virginia, dateline.) If that weren’t enough, Fars continued, “According to the same Gallup poll, 60 percent of rural whites said they at least respected that Ahmadinejad doesn’t try to hide the fact that he’s Muslim.”

A Fars news editor said Friday that the outlet took the item off its English-language website once editors realized that The Onion wasn’t a legitimate news organization.

Without breaking from its farce, Onion Editor Will Tracy wrote in an e-mail that Fars is a subsidiary and that ”The Onion freely shares content with Fars and commends the journalists at Iran’s Finest News Source on their superb reportage,” Tracy wrote in his statement. There’s no word on whether either president is laughing.

Are you laughing about this mistakenly published news? Do you like The Onion’s news features? Feel free to share your thoughts and opinions with us!

Source: CNN

Image: Politix

The Apparent Death Of ‘Dear’

Dear Readers, Subscribers, and all Netizens:

Is “Dear” already an endangered species? Nowadays, fewer and fewer people use the salutation “Dear” in letters and notes that they write. Most of us already begin with the regular “Hi.” This could partly be attributed to the soaring of the digital age. While “Dear” has always worked for business letters or scribbled notes, it would seem rather ancient on your computer screen, smartphone, or other mobile device.

Come to think of it — we have always used “Dear” just because we have always used it. But if you think deeper and apply it to your workmates, it would seem rather strange. Say, you’ve met a business associate for the first time and address him or her as “Dear.” Or, use that salutation to the actual person you’re writing to face-to-face. At best, you will most probably be met with an icy glare, if not an uppercut to your jaw. If we went around the office calling everybody “Dear,” we would probably become a regular customer in the Human Resources Department.


Maybe “Dear” is destined to die a slow death after all, since everybody is already making the big switch from snail mail to e-mail and text. Maybe it is destined to be slowly replaced by the ubiquitous “Hi” or the ever-popular “Hey.” Or, is it attributable to the fact that most e-mailers and texters do not actually consult etiquette experts just like we do with hand-written letters?

Perhaps we should start bidding “Dear” a sad farewell before it becomes totally extinct.

Thank you for taking time to read this.

Sincerely yours,

Anonymous.

P.S.: Are you still using the salutation “Dear” in your e-mails or text messages? Do you “Dear” is already dead?

Image: Erik J. Heels