World’s Richest Man Becomes Richer Supplying ‘Obamaphones’ To The Poor

A Mexican telecom mogul who holds the title of world’s richest man, and one of President Obama’s top donors are both getting even richer from the U.S. government program that supplies so-called “Obamaphones” to the poor.

Carlos Slim, who has an estimated net worth of $70 billion, owns a controlling stake in TracFone, which makes $10 per phone for each device it provides to poor Americans. The company, whose president and CEO is Frederick “F.J.” Pollak, also makes money from extra minutes and data plans it sells to subscribers who get phones and service through the government’s Lifeline program. The program, which began in the mid-1980s, has exploded in the past four years after being expanded from supplying landlines to the poor to providing cellular phones.


U.S. Rep. Tim Griffin, (R-Ark.), who has been one of the biggest critics of the Lifeline program’s explosive growth, recently introduced a bill on Capitol Hill to end the Lifeline program, which cost $1.6 billion in 2011, up from $772 million in 2008. While not technically a tax, the program is funded by mandatory fees tacked on to consumers’ phone bills, then disbursed through the Federal Communications Commission and states. Griffin said he has seen cases in which single individuals obtained dozens of the phones, and said under the lax requirements, more than 80 million Americans are eligible.

The FCC announced in July that new reforms saved $43 million in savings by eliminating duplicate subscriptions and outdated subsidies and claims that the agency is on track to recover $200 million for the year. But Griffin said it’s time to end a subsidy that gives the poor a luxury item and makes the world’s wealthiest man richer.

Do you agree with Tim Griffin that Carlos Slim should be stopped supplying “Obamaphones” to the poor? Feel free to share your thoughts and opinions about this hot topic!

Source: Fox News

Image: France 24

U.S. Athletes To Face Huge Tax Bill After Olympics

When Olympic medalists return to the United States, they’re in high demand. Everyone, from Michael Phelps to a bronze medalist in judo will be sitting for television interviews, talking to newspapers, going to assemblies at local schools and celebrating with friends, family and young athletes. They’ll also draw some unwanted interest from everyone’s favorite bureaucrats: the IRS.

Medalists will have to pay hefty taxes for standing on the podium in London. It’s not the value of the medal itself that will require a separate line on this years tax returns, it’s the tax on the prize money that comes with a gold, silver or bronze. The United States Olympic Committee rewards Olympic medalists with honorariums. A gold medal brings $25,000. Silver medals get you $15,000. And a bronze is worth $10,000.


The Weekly Standard, a conservative news magazine, ran the numbers and tabulated that the tax bill on a gold is $8,986, silver is $5,385 and bronze is $3,500. They note that Missy Franklin, an amateur who has yet to cash in on her fame with endorsements, already owes $14,000 in taxes from her gold and silver medal. By the time the Games are finished, Franklin’s tax bill could reach $30,000.

Come on, government. I know you’re as inflexible as the IOC and couldn’t decide on pizza toppings unless a bipartisan commission deliberated for 13 days, but you can’t make an exception to athletes representing our country in the biggest event in the world? It’s not unheard of: Military members are exempt from taxes when they’re deployed in a combat zone.

What can you say about the tax code that governs U.S. Olympians? Does it warrant revision? Share your thoughts with us!

Source: Yahoo News

Image: CBS News