Report: Obama Administration Spied On Fox News Reporter

Report Obama Administration Spied On Fox News ReporterThe Justice Department spied extensively on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, collecting his telephone records, tracking his movements in and out of the State Department and seizing two days of Rosen’s personal emails,the Washington Post reported on Monday.

‘Breaking anti-espionage law’

In a chilling move sure to rile defenders of civil liberties, an FBI agent also accused Rosen of breaking anti-espionage law with behavior that—as described in the agent’s own affidavit—falls well inside the bounds of traditional news reporting.

Fox News responds with a blistering statement that asserts Rosen was “simply doing his job” in his role as “a member of what up until now has always been a free press.”


‘Unconstitutional’

The revelations surfaced with President Barack Obama’s administration already under fire for seizing two months of telephone records of reporters and editors at the Associated Press. Obama last week said he makes “no apologies” for investigations into national security-related leaks. The AP’s CEO, Gray Pruitt, said Sunday that the seizure was “unconstitutional.”

The case began when Rosen reported on June 11, 2009, that U.S. intelligence believed North Korea might respond to tighter United Nations sanctions with new nuclear tests. Rosen reported that the information came from CIA sources inside the hermetic Stalinist state. FBI agent Reginald Reyes wrote that there was evidence Rosen had broken the law, “at the very least, either as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator,” the Post said.

Do you think James Rosen indeed broke the law in the course of his information research? Is spying on a reporter counted as an “unconstitutional” act?

Source: Olivier Knox, Yahoo News

Image: Daily Tech

Paul Ryan’s Soup Kitchen Photo Op Angers Charity President

Paul Ryan's Soup Kitchen Photo Op Angers Charity PresidentRepublican Rep. Paul Ryan stopped by a soup kitchen in Youngstown, Ohio, over the weekend for what seemed to be your typical campaign photo opportunity. During his 15-minute visit on Saturday morning, the vice presidential candidate donned a white apron and offered to wash some dishes that—as several bloggers and a pool reporter later pointed out—did not appear to be dirty.

‘Ramrodded their way’

“We just wanted to come by and say thanks for doing what you do,” Ryan said. “This is what makes society go. It makes it work. Helping people.”

But according to the president of Mahoning County’s St. Vincent De Paul Society, the faith-based charity that runs the soup kitchen, the campaign did not have permission and “ramrodded their way” into the facility.


‘He did nothing’

“We are apolitical because the majority of our funding is from private donations,” Brian Antal told the Washington Post. “It’s strictly in our bylaws not to do it. They showed up there, and they did not have permission. They got one of the volunteers to open up the doors… He did nothing. He just came in here to get his picture taken at the dining hall.”

Ryan spokesman Michael Steel told ABC News, “It was a great opportunity to highlight the importance of volunteerism and local charities.”

Antal, though, said it was just too risky for the charity to appear to be favoring one party over the other: “I can’t afford to lose funding from these private individuals,” he told the Post. “If this was the Democrats, I’d have the same exact problem.”

It may sound silly, but there’s a reason even a soup kitchen controversy could impact the presidential race. Why? Because it took place in Ohio. “We need to win Ohio,” Romney said on Friday. “If we win Ohio, we take back America.”

Do you approve of Paul Ryan’s soup kitchen photo op? Are you going to vote for him during the elections?

Source: Yahoo News

Image: WN