North Korea Threatens Nuclear Strike On U.S. After U.N. Approves New Sanctions

North Korea Threatens Nuclear Strike On U.S. After U.N. Approves New SanctionsAn unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang’s Foreign Ministry said North Korea will exercise its right for “a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors” because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.

‘Engulfed in a sea of fire’

At a mass rally in Pyongyang on Thursday, Army Gen. Kang Pyo Yong told the crowd that North Korea is ready to fire long-range nuclear-armed missiles at Washington.

“Intercontinental ballistic missiles and various other missiles, which have already set their striking targets, are now armed with lighter, smaller and diversified nuclear warheads and are placed on a standby status,” Kang said. “When we shell (the missiles), Washington, which is the stronghold of evils, …. will be engulfed in a sea of fire.”

White House spokesman Jay Carney said at a briefing that the U.S. is fully capable of defending itself after a North Korean missile attack.  U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice reacted to the warnings Thursday, saying North Korea will “achieve nothing” with threats.


‘Fourth round of sanctions’

The U.N. Security Council unanimously endorsed a fourth round of sanctions against Pyongyang in a fresh attempt to rein in its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The new sanctions are aimed at making it more difficult for North Korea to finance and obtain material for its weapons programs.

North Korean threats have become more common as tensions have escalated following a rocket launch by Pyongyang in December and its third nuclear test on Feb. 12. Both acts defied three Security Council resolutions that bar North Korea from testing or using nuclear or ballistic missile technology and from importing or exporting material for these programs.

Do you think North Korea will carry out its threat of nuclear strike on the U.S.? Should the U.S. vote for more sanctions for NoKor?

Source: Fox News

Image: The Guardian

Say Goodbye To Excessively Loud TV Ads

Say Goodbye To Excessively Loud TV AdsBeginning Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission is barring broadcasters and pay TV providers from airing excessively loud commercials, saying ads must maintain the “same average volume” as the programs they accompany.

‘CALM Act’

The move — which undoubtedly will make many TV viewers happier, and save countless marriages — addresses a problem that, regulators say, is almost as old as television itself. Loud commercials have been a leading source of complaints to the FCC since its consumer call center began reporting top complaints in 2002.

Congress mandated the change in the aptly named Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation, or CALM, Act in 2010. Last year, the FCC set a December 13, 2012, deadline for full compliance. The CALM Act bill had wide bipartisan support, passing the Senate unanimously and the House by a voice vote.


‘Full implementation’

Bill supporters Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-California, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, and industry representatives plan an event in Washington on Thursday to mark the full implementation of the law.

The FCC says it has granted two temporary waivers to the law: one to South Georgia Governmental Services Authority, a municipal cable system, because of financial hardship; and to WPFO in Waterville, Maine, which asked for a grant because it is relocating its facilities. Non-commercial television stations are exempt from the act. Political ads, however, must comply.

Are you in favor of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act bill? What are your other woes regarding commercials? Feel free to share your opinion with us through the comment box below!

Source: Mike M. Ahlers, CNN

Image: Albany 2 Cents